QUOTE(cyberscribbler @ Nov 16 2007, 03:22 PM)
The precidence has already been set. Country A goes to war against country B because they hold different religious/governmental/commerce beliefs.
It's when the ideas are acted on, tangible vs intangible, going back to your comparison.
Someone could hate their neighbor all day long because they mows their grass from side to side and not front to back, like he does. When his hatred causes the other harm is where it enters the physical realm.
I think comparing actions of countries to actions of individuals is an apple to oranges comparison worthy of a different discussion.
I am in complete agreement with your other point. In fact, it is identical to my original argument: hatred only becomes an issue when it crosses into the physical realm.
Hate laws apply additional penalites to the feeling that motivates a crime; my concern is that one day the converse would be law too.