QUOTE(Windaria @ Nov 22 2005, 04:40 PM)
LOLOLOL. I am very sorry, but so many adults today are absolutely clueless. Yes, children, however that, in many cases, means something far different today that it did even just 15 years ago now.
Some of the most sexually active people I have EVER known have been 13 year old girls. Even when the boys were still partly clueless, they were about as active as anyone could ever imagine, getting depressed if they didn't do it that day. Even being older and married now (and fortunately never did anything with any of them), it still baffles me how they could think that it was a daily necessity like they did.
Despite that, so many parents, and so many adults, always want to look at them and (at the very least, if they are under 16), think of their children as their little angles. The fact is that in this day and age they may be more experienced than some of your friends, and they may know a lot more than you realize. It is a sad and horrible fact.
Is this all kids? Absolutely not, but be aware, I knew a lot of them. On top of it all, the really striking thing is that the girls were typically more active than the boys, at least those that were active. Maybe it is because they are being hit on by the 16 year old guys, who knows, but be aware, they start it younger every year.
And sally is dead on. She may not have physically committed the act, but the term "sexually active" isn't restricted to the physical activity, as she was sexually active in the way she was swapping pictures if nothing else... and this may be more common than many people realize.
Does that make her guilty of murder?